VACostCutting

Friday, March 21, 2008

How to End the Panic

Steve Forbes offers a few thoughts on what the Bush administration should be doing to halt the credit crisis.

The weak dollar is pummeling equities, disrupting the economy, distorting global trade and giving hundreds of billions of dollars in windfall revenues--through skyrocketing commodity prices--to our adversaries such as Iran and Venezuela. Not since Jimmy Carter has the U.S. had a President so oblivious to the damage done by an increasingly feeble greenback.

Continue reading here.

Monday, March 17, 2008

Fiscal Crossroads of 2008

The United States is facing a dire fiscal situation if significant changes aren't made in the next decade. Reigning in federal spending is as important as any issue facing the United States in the 21st Century.

On March 15, The Wall Street Journal published an excellent column by South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford addressing the crossroads we find ourselves at in the 2008 election.


Last week, I asked David Walker, the U.S. comptroller general, why he is quitting his job to travel the country on a "fiscal wake-up tour." His answer: Because we have only five to 10 years to address the federal government's looming shortfalls before we're faced with a fiscal crisis.

In about a decade, the twin forces of demographics and compound interest will leave few options for solving the fiscal mess Washington has created. By then, our options will all be ugly. We could make draconian spending cuts, or impose large tax increases that will undermine our economy in the competitive global marketplace. Or we could debase the value of the dollar by printing a large amount of money. This would shrink the overall value of the federal government's debt. It would also wipe out the value of most Americans' savings.

Mr. Walker is right. And I join many others in saying that federal spending is now as significant an issue as the war on terror, federal judgeships and energy independence. The U.S. stands at a fiscal crossroads -- and the consequences of inaction, or wrongful action, will be real and severe.

Continue reading here.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

A Consequence of Gas Tax Increases

Some legislators are proposing a statewide gas tax increase to fund transportation. Besides the prospect of reaching a point of diminishing returns as gas prices spike and Virginians eventually begin to drive less, a gas tax increase is also poor policy because it serves to perpetuate Virginia’s donor status when it comes to federal distribution of transportation dollars.

Currently Virginia only gets back 92 cents for every dollar sent to the federal government. The higher our state gas tax, the lower the likelihood the federal government will equalize what Virginia gets back versus what we already send to Washington.

While some legislators may want to subsidize transportation projects in recipient states, the vast majority of Virginians might not.

Below are the rate of return figues for all 50 states.


Alabama
106.91%
Alaska
526.85%
Arizona
92.00%
Arkansas
105.44%
California
92.00%
Colorado
92.00%
Connecticut
128.69%
Delaware
163.92%
Dist. of Col.
423.03%
Florida
92.00%
Georgia
92.00%
Hawaii
175.54%
Idaho
143.78%
Illinois
92.00%
Indiana
92.00%
Iowa
92.00%
Kansas
95.01%
Kentucky
96.14%
Louisiana
95.48%
Maine
95.62%
Maryland
92.00%
Massachusetts
92.00%
Michigan
92.00%
Minnesota
92.00%
Mississippi
95.80%
Missouri
97.80%
Montana
227.10%
Nebraska
99.12%
Nevada
93.53%
New Hampshire
100.47%
New Jersey
92.00%
New Mexico
114.22%
New York
109.79%
North Carolina
92.00%
North Dakota
207.44%
Ohio
92.00%
Oklahoma
92.00%
Oregon
101.87%
Pennsylvania
113.33%
Rhode Island
217.23%
South Carolina
92.00%
South Dakota
197.75%
Tennessee
92.00%
Texas
92.00%
Utah
92.30%
Vermont
204.85%
Virginia
92.00%
Washington
92.00%
West Virginia
169.31%
Wisconsin
102.95%
Wyoming
151.89%

Monday, March 10, 2008

Where Does Your Money Go?

When a Virginian buys groceries, purchases a cheeseburger and fries, or pays a utility bill, he or she is presented with a receipt detailing the cost of individual items or services purchased, the tax included in the total, and a total amount due. The issuance of an itemized receipt is a standard practice that holds the retailer accountable and makes the customer aware where every penny goes.

Because Virginians are limited insofar as their ability to take their business elsewhere when it comes to paying taxes, that is all the more reason to demand an itemized tax bill that details how much and on what services government is spending their hard earned money. With Virginia facing an uncertain fiscal outlook over the course of the biennium and beyond, and the ever present specter of tax increases lurking on the horizon, it is imperative that Virginians know how their money is being spent.

Virginia's Auditor of Public Accounts recently created a new webpage using Commonwealth Data Point titled "Where Does Your Money Go?" This page is a step forward in efforts to put transparency in taxation into action and allow Virginians easy access to such information.

Back in 2005, in a victory for transparency, Senator Walter Stosch secured passage of legislation which required Virginia's Auditor of Public Accounts to create a website, now called Commonwealth Data Point, where anyone can access state expenditure, revenue, and demographic data for the last decade. Building on this achievement, Delegate Saxman worked with the Auditor’s office to expand the functions of Commonwealth Data Point to include a website that puts itemization into action.

Using this website, anyone can enter an amount of individual income tax, sales and use tax, or other direct taxes paid by an entity or individual to the state of Virginia for the prior fiscal year and generate a report displaying, both in percentages and real dollars, how their general fund tax dollars were spent. The report also gives percentages for the four previous fiscal years as well—meaning Virginians can see how spending priorities have changed over time.

For example, according the Data Point, if a Virginian pays $1,000 in income taxes, 35 percent or $350 of that was spent on K-12 education in Fiscal Year 2007. Taken in comparison with the four prior fiscal years, it is clear that spending on education has increased from 31 percent in 2003 to 35 percent in 2007—with no appreciable increase in the quality of education or quality of outcome in Virginia’s public schools.

Transparency can still improve in Virginia, but this is a major positive development.

Take a moment to look at the new Data Point website here.

Friday, January 11, 2008

How much do private schools save Virginia?

According to an expert with the General Assembly's Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC), there are approximately 125,000 K-12 aged students attending private schools in Virginia. Approximately 24,000 students are home schooled.

If these students all entered the public schools system, what would the fiscal impact look like?

In FY 2007, Virginia spent roughly $3,750 per student for State Standards of Quality regular instruction purposes. When add-on costs (special education, vocational education, remedial instruction and English as a second language) are included the figure is $4,229 per student. Using these two figures a high and low end of the cost estimate can be established. Do the math and you arrive at a cost between $468 million and $531 million dollars.

Do the same math for home schooled children and you get a figure between $90 million and $101.5 million dollars. Overall, kids educated in private schools and home schools saved the Commonwealth between $558 and $632.5 million per year.

Given the fact that parents privately educating and home schooling their children are saving the Commonwealth roughly over half a billion dollars per year, isn't tax relief on that basis in order? Virginia offers tax credits to encourage land conservation and historical preservation. Why shouldn't we invest in our future as well by offering tax credits to parents and opening more educational opportunities for all children?

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Pelosi spends $16,000 tax dollars on flowers

According to The Hill, Nancy Pelosi has spent $16K this year on flowers. Overall, Pelosi's office has spent $3 million dollars over the first nine months of 2007, compared to 1.8 million spent by Speaker Dennis Hastert over the same period in 2006. Republican leader John Boehner's expenses have also increased this year.

It his hard to argue that fiscal responsibility has returned to Capitol Hill with $16,000 spent on flowers.

Read the full story

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Scotland looks to Virginia

To ensure that Scotland is making progress, the Scottish National Party, which controls the Scottish Parliament, is modeling government management procedures after Virginia's.

From the SNP's website:

We will bring forward proposals for new management and monitoring arrangements for government and agencies, based on the successful model in Virginia, USA, so we can bring greater rigour and success to the delivery of public policy in our nation.